To what extent do the writers and their arguments extend, corroborate, complicate, contradict, correct, or debate one another?
• Madison and Dahl: Creating and maintaining a functional democracy • Rawls and Rousseau: The influence of Rousseau on Racal’s view of utilitarianism • Dahl and West: The durability of democracy •
Wollstonecraft, Gilman, and hooks: Women’s rights and feminism • Carnegie and Galbraith: issues of poverty vs. the freedom of the individual to pursue wealth • Wollstonecraft and Chang: Women’s
opportunities • Smith and Carnegie: Views of capitalism and the nature of poverty • Aristotle and Appiah: The idea of happiness • Aristotle and Nietzsche: Ideas of good and bad • Singer and Mason
and Madison or Lafayette: Human rights and animal rights • Delaney and Douglass: Approaches to writing the American slave narrative