Pick one of the following three options. Each option is made up of three sub-questions (A, B, and C). Use those sub-questions as sub-titles to divide your essay into three clear parts, in which you
answer each sub-question in turn.

OPTION 1: THE PROBLEM OF MEANINGLESSNESS (A) Put forward the strongest argument you can for the claim that the smallness of our lives in space and time makes our lives pointless (or at least
deeply problematic in some way). (B) Put forward what you consider to be the strongest objection (or objections) to the argument you just set out. (C) Explain which side of this debate wins (if
any), and justify your judgement philosophically (Or, if you think that it’s a stale-mate, then explain why that is).
OPTION 2: ONTOTHEISM (A) Describe what you think the most perfect possible being would be like. (B) Justify your description philosophically (i.e. give arguments for why we ought to think of the
most perfect possible being as being that way). (C) Raise one objection, i.e. explain how someone might argue that the most perfect possible being would actually be different to how you described
(at least in one respect).
OPTION 3: ONTOTHEISM & MEANINGFULNESS (A) Pick a conception of God, and briefly describe what God is taken to be like on that conception. (B) Explain in what ways the existence of such a God would
make life better and more desirable (justifying your claims by means of argument). (C) Explain in what ways the existence of such a God would make life worse and less desirable (justifying your
claims by means of argument).