Topic: RESPONSE PAPER
Order Description
• Response paper.
One response paper (1250-1500 words in length), and one final learning statement (details to follow), will be required. The point of these papers, as with all of your activities in this course, is to learn. I am not looking for any “right” answers but for ideas that are well supported by evidence from the texts, from our discussions, and from your experience. Your papers should be explorations of ideas and connections that you are discovering rather than summaries or “academic” papers that are complicated without saying anything that is yours. They will be graded for coherence, creativity and original thought, as well as for use of evidence that is grounded in the readings. They will also be graded on organization, grammatical accuracy, and fluency in the written language. University rules in regards to plagiarism must be strictly adhered to. I will use either the University’s plagiarism check or another online program to verify all papers. This is standard practice and not a reflection of “concern” on my part.
__________________
I have my introduction which she has accepted, also I have an example she sent it to me to understand what she want.
this is her comment of my introduction:
It is a fine introduction. Just make sure that you bring in the readings as they are relevant to your story and that you do more than just describe the situation. You will need to bring some analysis, again, drawing on the readings you have done.
• Tyack, D. & Cuban, L. (1995). Why the grammar of schooling persists. In Tinkering Toward Utopia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Group 1) • Lortie, D. (1975/2002). Chapter 1: The hand of history. In Schoolteacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Group 2) • Siddle-Walker, E.V. Walker, V.S. (2001). African American teaching in the South: 1940-1960. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 751-779 (Group 3) • Listen to this episode of This American Life: http://m.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/562/the-problem-we-all-live-with • Nussbaum, M. (2010). Chapters 1 – 3. In Not for Profit. Princeton: Princeton University Press. (pp. 1–46) • Kincheloe, (2008). Chapter 1, Introduction. Critical pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 1-44). • Andreotti, V. & de Souza, L.M.T.M. (2008). Global learning in the ‘knowledge society’: Four tools for discussion. ZEP, pp. 7-12. • Robinson, K. (October 14, 2010) Changing education paradigms. RSAnimate. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDZFcDGpL4U • Ball, D.L., & Forzani, F.M. (2007). What makes education research “educational”? Educational Researcher, 36 (9), 529-540. • Hawkins, D. (2002). I, Thou, and It. In The informed vision. Boulder: University Press of Colorado. • Rodgers, C. (2014) Powerpoint of Hawkins’ “I, Thou, and It” with narration. • Swartz, T. (197?). Larry. Educational Solutions Newsletter. pp. 4-9. These references that we use and you can only choose that you need from they ones. it will be (1250-1500 words in length),
