Hi there! You recently worked on my project and i got some feedback and I needed you to fix somethings around. this is what the feed back said.

See “suggestions” below for coins, stocks and randoms. Your conclusions/calculations seem OK, so juist the graphs are needed.
Colors: Please redo the graph and then see if any new conclusions jump out at you.

Specific Feedback

Ø Coins: Close. The point of graphing is to make conclusions jump out. Why not do Dim-H, Dime-T, then a gap, then Dollar-H, Dollar-T, etc. That may make your conclusion more graphically compelling.

Ø Stocks: So do you remember that I won’t give any partial credit whatsoever for stocks if they are done on the computer. So please do this by hand or you’ll start out with ten points off out of fifty on the final project. That said, orient your paper “portrait” style and use every inch of the vertical size of the paper to spread out your graph so that peaks and valleys are visually compelling. For example, I can’t tell if Google is really a flat line or not without having to work and look at the raw data. Your use of dual scales is an interesting idea. Consider “broken scale” which might do a better job since you actually have two “gaps” – between Apple & Nike and also between the INDU and everything else.

Ø Randoms: Close … but when we talk about standard deviation, it means we think the curve might be a bell (ie Normal) curve. So a frequency polygon is far more appropriate. Calculations look OK

Ø Temps: Perfect – DO NOT REDO THIS. DO NOT RESUBMIT THIS.

Ø Colors: Try doing different pie/circle charts for each eye color with the pie slices in each pie representing the clothing preference for the respective group members.

For stocks you can draw it out and take a picture of it, and send me that. Just because he does not want and online version if that makes sense. thank you so much.