A real organisation was selected for this (HB Group), not a fictional one, and the issue or decision under investigation is also real (fault in motivational strategies).I have already gathered primary research from the organisation. The research is relevant to the question and is attached to in the files. You have to carry out research that addresses an issue facing an organization or
analyses a decision to be made by an organisation.
Your title is very important. Your title has to give focus and direction and must be framed as a question (If you feel like there is a better way to formulate a question that was already given to you, kindly change it). You must produce a written report that does not exceed 2,000 words. The format must be as followed in the draft document. First of all, you need a concise, clear, explicit summary (maximum 200 words) of your whole work. I have written an introduction to what I am doing, however I want you to improve on that. I should be able to read it and know everything you did – from the beginning till the end. The abstract must include any recommendations or conclusions.
The research question and executive summary should guide the reader to the substance of the report. You have to try to include everything in your summary, from the introduction, to the methodology, to your findings and conclusions. It is recommended that the executive summary include three elements: the research question, the scope of the research (including the methodology), the main findings, conclusions and recommendations. Moving on to the Introduction. Briefly outline the issue in your introduction section. This is NOT a history of the company. End with: This has therefore led me to the following research question: Put your title at the end of your introduction. Explain why you are researching what you’re researching. After the introduction, comes the methodology section. This is your full methodology. It must include ALL research used – and this research should be evaluated. I.e. how useful was that research? How reliable? Valid? Were there any problems faced? How were they solved? Tell us about what you did, in a step by step format. If you had the chance to do this again, what would you change and why? Expand on what was already written. After the methodology come the results, which I already included. After, the analysis in discussion.This is where you have the opportunity to earn the most marks. This is the most important part of your report. This is NOT the time to have lots of graphs and charts. This is a DISCUSSION of your findings.
Answer the question here.
Have a discussion (but a formal one!)
Look at effects, causes, solutions (The IMAPCT). Consider the needs of the company.
Consider alternatives.
Consider possible reasons.
 Use your findings to back up your arguments and it is OK to make judgements, ask questions – critically evaluate!! Identify the main issues and explain their significance.
 What do your findings tell you about your company? Is this a good indicator for the company?
Remember to use business tools to help you along in your discussion. But be careful, do NOT allow your whole analysis to be a load of business tools. It should be mostly TEXT in the form of a discussion (with subtitles), with the odd business tool to help you prove your points, assess and make judgments.
Remember:
To evaluate (weigh up the arguments) Rationale (look for possible reasons)
Critically examine/assess (for and against)
Reflective discussion: always reflect on your suggestions and ideas and findings. “This could be due to…”?. And then conclusion.

Overall, it is a heavy load. However use these as guides:

http://www.riverwoodinternationalcharterschool.org/schoolsite-legacy/images/stories/Summer2012CareerTech.pdf

https://ibmastery.mykajabi.com/blog/how-to-structure-a-business-and-management-internal-assessment