Critically analyse, evaluate, compare and contrast the following 2 publications

Order Description
Please critically analyse, evaluate, compare and contrast the following 2 publications:

“Advances in the Understanding of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy.”
Chang et al. Blood. 2016 Aug 25; 128(8): 1043-9.

“Trauma-induced coagulopathy–a review of the systematic reviews: is there sufficient evidence to guide clinical transfusion practice?” Curry et al. Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 2011 Jul; 25(3): 217-231.

You must discuss the relative merits and limitations of these two papers, not just give a detailed descriptive review of the components. Please use evidence to support your critiques.

In detail, compare and critically contrast the methodologies. (5 points)

Do you think that the authors could have chosen a more appropriate methodology than the one they used for each paper? If you do believe the methodology was optimal please thoroughly discuss & support. If not, please describe in detail what you believe the optimal methodology to develop the guideline would entail. Use evidence to support (or refute) your critique. (10 points)

Critically analyse and evaluate the abstracts of the publications: (10 points)

Critically analyse and evaluate the introductions. (10 points)

Critically analyse and evaluate the body of the publications. (30 points)

Critically analyse and evaluate the conclusions. (5 points)

Specify and discuss the strengths of each article. (5 points)

Specify and discuss the limitations of each article. (5 points)