Category: Question

We can work on Decision analysis and rational decision making model

Decision analysis and rational decision making model are presented as tools to improve health care provider decisions. Clinical Decision Analysis (CDA) is always cautioned to be used as as “a reference in decision making” or “detailed care is required when interpreting the results of CDA studies and applying them to clinical practice”. I argue thatRead more about We can work on Decision analysis and rational decision making model[…]

We can work on Organizational Behavior Name Institution   Organizational Behavior Prompt 5A The aphorism “culture eats strategy for breakfast” implies that a single ideology cannot achieve an organization’s success without being supported by key strategies. Thus, organizational leaders have to maintain cultural coherence across all departments, particularly in determining corporate strategy. Strategy, capabilities, and culture need to be aligned for best results (Riccucci, 2014). All teams need to be engaged in every activity to promote positive organizational behavior. In an organization, I would use this thinking to encourage better working strategies that engage all subordinates in across all organizations portfolios. I would also use culture when drafting an organizational strategy. Consequently, maintaining cultural coherence in the organization succeeds when leaders incorporate capabilities, knowledge, and strategies effectively. Prompt 5B Setting goals to direct organizational performance is a sign that the organization has a definite target to achieve. One of the attributes of goals is that they serve as a direct function since they direct attention and effort towards the achievement of the organization’s activities. The second aspect of goals is that they have an energizing function (Locke, & Latham, 2002). Great or high goals lead to more exceptional achievements than small goals. When the leader sets top targets, which may seem unachievable, more significant efforts are channeled towards their, unlike when low goals are set (Locke, & Latham, 2002). When a team has more significant targets to achieve, they have higher self-efficacy than those working towards a lower target. The third attribute is that goals affect persistence as continuous success inspires people to work for higher achievement after achievement of tasks at hand. The last quality is that goals affect action indirectly by enhancing arousal, discovery, and leading to task recovery by directing essential knowledge and strategies. In the organization, I would use goals more effectively by inviting the subordinates to take part in the goal-setting exercise. By making employees set goals will motivate them to work towards achieving the specific goals as they would feel appreciated and recognized. This theory will also make other subordinates to own the goals hence embrace efficacy and persistence in achieving them. Goals can be used to promote collaborative behavior in the workplace (Locke, & Latham, 2002). Consequently, goal setting and implementation strategies that positively impact organizational culture. During my internship program at Scripps Health in the HR Department, I was involved in a goal setting activity. The CEO organization welcomed all the subordinates to contribute to the process. The experience helped me to develop an insight over the importance of having inclusive leadership as it helps in motivating employees and other stakeholders to work towards the same goals.   References Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist, 57(9), 705. Riccucci, N. M. (2014). Leadership and the transformation of a major institution: Charles Rossotti and the Internal Revenue Service. In Serving the Public Interest: Profiles of Successful and Innovative Public Servants (pp. 24-35). Routledge.

Organizational Behavior Name Institution   Organizational Behavior Prompt 5A The aphorism “culture eats strategy for breakfast” implies that a single ideology cannot achieve an organization’s success without being supported by key strategies. Thus, organizational leaders have to maintain cultural coherence across all departments, particularly in determining corporate strategy. Strategy, capabilities, and culture need to beRead more about We can work on Organizational Behavior Name Institution   Organizational Behavior Prompt 5A The aphorism “culture eats strategy for breakfast” implies that a single ideology cannot achieve an organization’s success without being supported by key strategies. Thus, organizational leaders have to maintain cultural coherence across all departments, particularly in determining corporate strategy. Strategy, capabilities, and culture need to be aligned for best results (Riccucci, 2014). All teams need to be engaged in every activity to promote positive organizational behavior. In an organization, I would use this thinking to encourage better working strategies that engage all subordinates in across all organizations portfolios. I would also use culture when drafting an organizational strategy. Consequently, maintaining cultural coherence in the organization succeeds when leaders incorporate capabilities, knowledge, and strategies effectively. Prompt 5B Setting goals to direct organizational performance is a sign that the organization has a definite target to achieve. One of the attributes of goals is that they serve as a direct function since they direct attention and effort towards the achievement of the organization’s activities. The second aspect of goals is that they have an energizing function (Locke, & Latham, 2002). Great or high goals lead to more exceptional achievements than small goals. When the leader sets top targets, which may seem unachievable, more significant efforts are channeled towards their, unlike when low goals are set (Locke, & Latham, 2002). When a team has more significant targets to achieve, they have higher self-efficacy than those working towards a lower target. The third attribute is that goals affect persistence as continuous success inspires people to work for higher achievement after achievement of tasks at hand. The last quality is that goals affect action indirectly by enhancing arousal, discovery, and leading to task recovery by directing essential knowledge and strategies. In the organization, I would use goals more effectively by inviting the subordinates to take part in the goal-setting exercise. By making employees set goals will motivate them to work towards achieving the specific goals as they would feel appreciated and recognized. This theory will also make other subordinates to own the goals hence embrace efficacy and persistence in achieving them. Goals can be used to promote collaborative behavior in the workplace (Locke, & Latham, 2002). Consequently, goal setting and implementation strategies that positively impact organizational culture. During my internship program at Scripps Health in the HR Department, I was involved in a goal setting activity. The CEO organization welcomed all the subordinates to contribute to the process. The experience helped me to develop an insight over the importance of having inclusive leadership as it helps in motivating employees and other stakeholders to work towards the same goals.   References Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American psychologist, 57(9), 705. Riccucci, N. M. (2014). Leadership and the transformation of a major institution: Charles Rossotti and the Internal Revenue Service. In Serving the Public Interest: Profiles of Successful and Innovative Public Servants (pp. 24-35). Routledge.[…]

We can work on Cognitive Functioning In Elderly Presentation

 Assimilate the information into a presentation with screencast (you may use Screencast-O-Matic) or simply record using Microsoft PowerPoint recording (see the PowerPoint Recording Tutorial) and should include the points listed below.        Your presentation must be 10 to 12 slides (not including title and references slides) and utilize the Final Presentation Template. YourRead more about We can work on Cognitive Functioning In Elderly Presentation[…]

We can work on Research Article on Ecclesial Leadership for an organizational leadership journal

Write a Theological Research Article on Ecclesial Leadership for an organizational leadership journal of your choice. include the Abstract, Introduction, 75 References and the final Appendix Page. Use the journal scope of your theological enquiry, and the research methodology you intend to employ the focus of your paper. Sample Solution the books of the bibleRead more about We can work on Research Article on Ecclesial Leadership for an organizational leadership journal[…]

We can work on Law and Ethical Reasoning Name of Student Institutional Affiliation  Law and Ethical Reasoning Living a will provide people with the opportunity to state their preferences about the type of medical treatment they can receive if they are unable to give informed consent (Rao, 2000). The living wills are useful in any case where the patient cannot state their medical choices. In a large number of states, pregnant women do not have equal right as other people to create and adhere to a living will. The justification for the exclusion of pregnant women is that they may not have considered the effects of their choices during pregnancy. These statutes claim to protect women who would be devastated to find out that the doctor continued with a life-ending treatment while in fact, she would have chosen to continue with life-sustaining treatment to give the fetus an opportunity to grow. Living wills for pregnant women are heavily influenced by the politics surrounding abortion. Most state legislatures have a clause to sidestep the living will as it is only logical to protect the life of the unborn baby by giving the incapacitated pregnant woman life-sustaining treatment. However, this decision does not consider that forcing medical care on the pregnant patient violates her autonomy as a woman. The pregnancy exemption laws impermissibly restrict the woman’s right to refuse unwanted medical intervention as well as their right to abortion. These exemptions also infringe on the pregnant woman’s ability to control their end of life healthcare, more commonly known as the “right to die” (Villarreal, 2018). In most cases, the illness or accident that incapacitates a pregnant woman also jeopardizes the health and survival of the fetus. Therefore, continuing the pregnancy is often futile. Maintaining a woman on life support is harmful to the fetus because ventilators and catheters often cause an infection that further jeopardizes the development of the fetus. The exemption of a pregnant woman from the right to enact a living will do not allow for the consideration of the pregnant woman’s pain, the growth of the unborn baby or the prognosis of the unborn baby (Villarreal, 2018). Pregnancy exemptions to living wills are unconstitutional, not only because they create an undue burden on the woman’s right to have an abortion before the fetus is viable but also because the state’s interest in the prospective life of the unborn baby cannot overrule a woman’s right to refuse medical care. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the court stated that women maintained the right to terminate a pregnancy before it was viable (Villarreal, 2018). However, the state’s interest in life would be allowed to proceed only if the restriction on the woman’s right to choose does not place an undue burden on the woman. If the woman is incapacitated due to injury or illness, continuing the pregnancy infringes on their right to choose by placing an undue burden on the woman (Epstein & Walker, 2013). Most states with the exemptions on pregnancy women coerce women into accepting unwanted medical care if it is possible that the fetus will grow to pave way for “live birth”; a standard that is vague and medically uncertain and therefore places an undue burden on the rights of women to abortion. In In re Quinlan, the court ruled that the individual’s right to privacy also includes the right to decline from unwanted medical care as well as the right to abortion (Rao, 2000). The ruling found that the state cannot compel unwanted medical care on people that have expressed their wish to stop life-sustaining medical care to medical professionals and others through the healthcare power of an attorney. This ruling should take precedence when a pregnant woman is incapacitated. The state’s interest in human life should not outweigh the person’s right to refuse unwanted medical care. Therefore, the state’s interest should not justify the violation of a woman’s bodily autonomy notwithstanding how far along she is in the pregnancy (Epstein & Walker, 2013). In my opinion, society should choose to maintain the woman’s autonomy over her body, above all else. If the patient is incapacitated with no signs of recovery, I will opt to discontinue treatment. Continuing to put a woman such as nancy under medical care would place a burden on her dying body to support a fetus. It would also lengthen the suffering of the patient. The purpose of medical care is to alleviate suffering not to increase it. Also, continuing to give medical care does not guarantee the survival of the fetus. It may also lead to the birth of an infant with severe defects. This infant would then begin a life with difficulties, and the chances of their survival would be minimized due to the lack of a mother. Continuing medical care also places financial stress on the family as well as the healthcare providers. Even though theoretically, the patients financial status should not determine the level of care they receive, in reality, it is among the most crucial factors in determining a patient’s access to healthcare. Therefore, society should consider the financial implications too. References Epstein, L., & Walker, T. G. (2013). Constitutional Law: Rights. Sage. Rao, R. (2000). Property, privacy, and the human body. BUL rev., 80, 359. Villarreal, E. (2018). Pregnancy and Living Wills: A Behavioral Economic Analysis. Yale LJF, 128, 1052.

Law and Ethical Reasoning Name of Student Institutional Affiliation  Law and Ethical Reasoning Living a will provide people with the opportunity to state their preferences about the type of medical treatment they can receive if they are unable to give informed consent (Rao, 2000). The living wills are useful in any case where the patientRead more about We can work on Law and Ethical Reasoning Name of Student Institutional Affiliation  Law and Ethical Reasoning Living a will provide people with the opportunity to state their preferences about the type of medical treatment they can receive if they are unable to give informed consent (Rao, 2000). The living wills are useful in any case where the patient cannot state their medical choices. In a large number of states, pregnant women do not have equal right as other people to create and adhere to a living will. The justification for the exclusion of pregnant women is that they may not have considered the effects of their choices during pregnancy. These statutes claim to protect women who would be devastated to find out that the doctor continued with a life-ending treatment while in fact, she would have chosen to continue with life-sustaining treatment to give the fetus an opportunity to grow. Living wills for pregnant women are heavily influenced by the politics surrounding abortion. Most state legislatures have a clause to sidestep the living will as it is only logical to protect the life of the unborn baby by giving the incapacitated pregnant woman life-sustaining treatment. However, this decision does not consider that forcing medical care on the pregnant patient violates her autonomy as a woman. The pregnancy exemption laws impermissibly restrict the woman’s right to refuse unwanted medical intervention as well as their right to abortion. These exemptions also infringe on the pregnant woman’s ability to control their end of life healthcare, more commonly known as the “right to die” (Villarreal, 2018). In most cases, the illness or accident that incapacitates a pregnant woman also jeopardizes the health and survival of the fetus. Therefore, continuing the pregnancy is often futile. Maintaining a woman on life support is harmful to the fetus because ventilators and catheters often cause an infection that further jeopardizes the development of the fetus. The exemption of a pregnant woman from the right to enact a living will do not allow for the consideration of the pregnant woman’s pain, the growth of the unborn baby or the prognosis of the unborn baby (Villarreal, 2018). Pregnancy exemptions to living wills are unconstitutional, not only because they create an undue burden on the woman’s right to have an abortion before the fetus is viable but also because the state’s interest in the prospective life of the unborn baby cannot overrule a woman’s right to refuse medical care. In Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the court stated that women maintained the right to terminate a pregnancy before it was viable (Villarreal, 2018). However, the state’s interest in life would be allowed to proceed only if the restriction on the woman’s right to choose does not place an undue burden on the woman. If the woman is incapacitated due to injury or illness, continuing the pregnancy infringes on their right to choose by placing an undue burden on the woman (Epstein & Walker, 2013). Most states with the exemptions on pregnancy women coerce women into accepting unwanted medical care if it is possible that the fetus will grow to pave way for “live birth”; a standard that is vague and medically uncertain and therefore places an undue burden on the rights of women to abortion. In In re Quinlan, the court ruled that the individual’s right to privacy also includes the right to decline from unwanted medical care as well as the right to abortion (Rao, 2000). The ruling found that the state cannot compel unwanted medical care on people that have expressed their wish to stop life-sustaining medical care to medical professionals and others through the healthcare power of an attorney. This ruling should take precedence when a pregnant woman is incapacitated. The state’s interest in human life should not outweigh the person’s right to refuse unwanted medical care. Therefore, the state’s interest should not justify the violation of a woman’s bodily autonomy notwithstanding how far along she is in the pregnancy (Epstein & Walker, 2013). In my opinion, society should choose to maintain the woman’s autonomy over her body, above all else. If the patient is incapacitated with no signs of recovery, I will opt to discontinue treatment. Continuing to put a woman such as nancy under medical care would place a burden on her dying body to support a fetus. It would also lengthen the suffering of the patient. The purpose of medical care is to alleviate suffering not to increase it. Also, continuing to give medical care does not guarantee the survival of the fetus. It may also lead to the birth of an infant with severe defects. This infant would then begin a life with difficulties, and the chances of their survival would be minimized due to the lack of a mother. Continuing medical care also places financial stress on the family as well as the healthcare providers. Even though theoretically, the patients financial status should not determine the level of care they receive, in reality, it is among the most crucial factors in determining a patient’s access to healthcare. Therefore, society should consider the financial implications too. References Epstein, L., & Walker, T. G. (2013). Constitutional Law: Rights. Sage. Rao, R. (2000). Property, privacy, and the human body. BUL rev., 80, 359. Villarreal, E. (2018). Pregnancy and Living Wills: A Behavioral Economic Analysis. Yale LJF, 128, 1052.[…]

We can work on Nursing Informatics Practicum Project

Identify a clinical, technological, or process-related business need affecting the organization for which you currently work or have previously worked. Be sure to identify the need from a Christian worldview using ethical decision making. Meet with your preceptor and stakeholders to better understand the business need. Write an essay (750–1,000 words) addressing the following: IdentifyRead more about We can work on Nursing Informatics Practicum Project[…]

We can work on Organizational Behavior Questions

Organizational Behavior Questions Question 1 Organizational behavior (OB) refers to the manner people within an organization respond to issues affecting the organization. OB is, therefore, a definition of the attitudes and actions of individuals towards themselves and the corporation and the overall effect on the functioning and performance of the business. As explained by ScanduraRead more about We can work on Organizational Behavior Questions[…]

We can work on Critique project

Read the book << only super-rich can save us>> by Ralph Nader. the main body of the critique paper will be 20 pages in length – i.e., 5 pages per the four specific “critique” requirements. The four specific “critique” requirements with respect to the first specific “critiquing” requirement (View # 1) for the critique project,Read more about We can work on Critique project[…]